Remove GCVote
See original GitHub issueLast days there are several reports on support mail and social media that cache loading gets stuck/slow in the phase of “Loading GCVote”. Own test also shows, that the server (sometimes not always) fails to reply.
As this service is active for most users (as it defaults to “on” for retrieving votes also if the user has no login to send votes) it causes a severe regression as cache refreshes take much longer.
As the service is almost discontinued it looks like the right time to remove it (maybe even on release
as a “bug fix”).
As a successor is discussed in #9664 we should maybe not throw away the UI part of the code though.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created a year ago
- Reactions:3
- Comments:9 (9 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
GCVote Help
compact layout: also called the expert mode, remove some text to improve layout on compact screens. hide on long lists: deactivates GCVote on...
Read more >Implement cachevote instead gc vote · Issue #9664 · cgeo/cgeo
Is there a way to extract the full database from GcVote, because there are over 8.000.000 votes? cgeo was able to display votes...
Read more >c:geo Settings
GCVote, A platform for voting on the quality of Geocaches ... Log template, In this section you can add/modify/remove custom templates for ...
Read more >GC-Vote - Source code - Greasy Fork
GC-Vote. displays average votes and lets users vote for the quality of caches on geocaching.com ... "This will delete all local cached data....
Read more >GCVote - General geocaching topics
Okay, what GCVote does is, when you find a cache you rate is 1-5 stars. ... creative or maybe even remove a cache...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
As I still see it responds quite unreliable, we also still get complaints about slow refresh of caches and given the current unmaintained status of GCVote I think the proposal of @moving-bits is a good compromise.
I could prepare a PR which
Users which want to continue using GCVote can re-enable it. (The forced change should be mentioned in the changelog…)
This could be an intermediary step until we have decided on how to proceed with GCVote.
What do you think?