`test_group_normalization` is flaky
See original GitHub issueThis is part of https://github.com/chainer/chainer/issues/6903 effort.
- Failure example: https://ci.preferred.jp/chainer.py27and35/2138/
- Failure test case:
GroupNormalizationTest_param_8_{dtype=float32, shape=(3, 8), groups=4}.test_backward_gpu_without_cudnn
- Tolerance:
E Not equal to tolerance rtol=0.01, atol=0.001
E
E Mismatch: 100%
E Max absolute difference: 0.15960103
E Max relative difference: 0.0476208
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:12 (12 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
What is Group Normalization? - Towards Data Science
Group Normalization (GN) is one of the latest normalization methods that avoids exploiting the batch dimension, thus is independent of batch ...
Read more >LocalHistoryZeroSuggestProvide...
LocalHistoryZeroSuggestProviderTest.Normalization is flaky. 4 flake occurrences of this test have been detected within the past 24 hours.
Read more >Why does Group Normalization work? - Cross Validated
In their paper Group Normalization the author introduce GroupNorm(GN) as a replacement for BatchNorm. They show that LayerNorm(LN) and ...
Read more >Empirical analysis of practitioners' perceptions of test flakiness ...
Are flaky tests bigger (i.e., lines of code)? The other factors such as perseverance of a team to detect and prevent flakiness will...
Read more >Group Normalization (Paper Explained) - YouTube
The dirty little secret of Batch Normalization is its intrinsic dependence on the training batch size. Group Normalization attempts to ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@toslunar I encountered the test failing, I put the link. https://github.com/chainer/chainer/pull/8074#issuecomment-535374411
Another example