Better typing for TaskQueue.wrap()
See original GitHub issueThis is the current type of TaskQueue.wrap():
wrap(func: (...args: any[]) => any, thisObject?: any): (...args: any[]) => any;
Don’t we know that func
will be returning a promise? And don’t we know that wrap
will also return a promise?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:6 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Typing Lessons | Advanced Wrap-up
Advanced Wrap-up | Practice numbers, advanced symbols, and accuracy skills.
Read more >Intermediate Wrap-up - Typing Lessons
Intermediate Wrap-up | Practice words, punctuation, and sentences.
Read more >Learn To Type And Improve Typing Speed Free - Typing.com
Learn to touch type and improve your typing speed with free interactive typing lessons for all ages. Start your typing practice now!
Read more >TaskRouter Task Resource Overview - Twilio
A TaskRouter Task represents a single item of work waiting to be processed. This overview covers task attributes, versions, and a Task lifecycle....
Read more >queue — A synchronized queue class — Python 3.11.1 ...
In addition, the module implements a “simple” FIFO queue type, ... If the data elements are not comparable, the data can be wrapped...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
The fix is now included in the latest release v1.1.2, does it work better?
Works flawlessly (in my simple use case). Thank you for maintaining this great project!