A simple proposal for better generated names
See original GitHub issueAlthough Chisel3 naming is definitely improving, I still find myself having to grep through the generated Firrtl for a wire/reg/module/etc. named _T*
every so often.
This process would be a bit more user friendly if the Chisel-generated names were distinguished by type. So wires could be named _W*
, registers _R*
, modules _M*
, and so forth.
I imagine (hope) this would not be a burdensome change, and it would definitely improve readability and ease my use case.
See also my related Firrtl request: ucb-bar/firrtl#469
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Reactions:2
- Comments:5 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Project Name Generator + Instant Availability Check
Thousands of name ideas for your next Project and instant domain availability check. Our tool will find you the perfect Project name.
Read more >Cool Project Name Generator in 2023 + Free Logo - Namify
This project name generator is a free and easy way to get cool project name ideas. ... GENERATE NAMES. To get the best...
Read more >268 Creative Business Name Ideas (Curated, Not Generated!)
Ditch the business name generators and use this list of over 200 creative, catchy, unique, and cool business name ideas—including lists of ...
Read more >FREE Business Name Generator: Company Name Ideas (2023)
The names generated are examples only and may be used by other businesses or ... business name ideas, here is how to choose...
Read more >The essential guide to choosing good project names
This article contains essential tips for choosing a cool name. You can also try our free name generator if you need extra inspiration....
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
when I first skimmed the proposal I assumed _M was for memories… which it should be.
This was done in
v3.4.0