Remove nanomount
See original GitHub issueWe can get a faster meaningful paint / time to live by removing nanomount
and just replacing all of the <body>
(we’re a top level framework, think it’s fine if we take control of what goes on in <body>
). This would be a breaking change tho, and personally I’d want to wait for an update in bankai
first to make the <script>
tag async.
See Also
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:9 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Tube Vibration Mounts - Nanomount Series - HUTCHINSON
Simple, compact, and rugged vibration isolators ideal for lightweight applications and small payloads. Low profile design for use in small installations.
Read more >NatoMounts Magnetic Device Mounts for iPhone, Android ...
Nato Mounts use high quality automotive grade 3M adhesive, so they will always hold strong but can also be easily removed if that...
Read more >customer feedback on our nanomount system
I am speaking of Mapleshade's Record Coupling System and Nanomount System. It's all about vibration. ... Removing them was a fairly simple affair....
Read more >nano mount - Amazon.com
Unee Magnetic Phone Mount, Magnetic Phone Holder for Car[Nano Silica Gel Strong Adsorption.
Read more >EXOS Nano Mount issue - Cloudy Nights
In any case I plan on keeping. Disassembly was super easy. Just take off the worm gears with Allen wrenches, unscrew the plastic...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
@bcomnes Hah, yeah with you - I’m not too worried about that one. Afaik none of the extensions I use currently conflict with this, and I reckon most people (e.g. not power users) might not even be running any extensions at all. If an extension really wants to stick on the DOM, they can always re-mount if ever unmounted.
@tgfjt oh yeah, wasn’t implying we only allow mounting on
body
- Nanomount mostly exists so that in the current context we can mount onbody
safelymmm, IMO, removing
nanomount
is ok, but mounting onlybody
is not ok for me.