Privileged configurable generic derivation
See original GitHub issueFrom your post https://meta.plasm.us/posts/2016/01/14/configuring-generic-derivation/
I was wondering if perhaps in a codebase, where there is a set convention (in my case snake_case over camelCase keys), it would be possible to configure that the priviledged .asJson
to would always mean use SnakeCaseKeys, and do the same also for the decoding API.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 8 years ago
- Reactions:2
- Comments:5 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Configuring generic derivation - Travis Brown
There are currently four different options you can configure: The ADT discriminator: should it be an object wrapper (the default) or a field?...
Read more >6 Variant Management - Oracle Help Center
Oracle Generic Configurator User Interface - an Oracle mask and User Interface. ... is used to derive an individually configured product, an Instance...
Read more >Privileged User and Group Configuration Activity - TechDocs
This option subgroup section of the policy monitors for privileged user and group configuration change-based events, such as the creation of superusers and ......
Read more >Arm Cortex-M33 Devices Generic User Guide r1p0
Name, Type, Required privilege, Reset value, Description. R0-R12, RW, Either, UNKNOWN, General-purpose registers. MSP, RW, Either, -, Stack Pointer.
Read more >Kubernetes cluster should not allow privileged containers
Organizations establish organization-wide configuration settings and subsequently derive specific settings for information systems. The established settings ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I’m going to reopen this issue because I can imagine providing explicit support for this—e.g. something like:
I’m not 100% sure I like this, but I think it’s worth discussing.
Using a package object at the root and declaring the package as such: