Wildcard support in acceptClasses / rejectClasses
See original GitHub issueThe docs for acceptClasses
and rejectClasses
mention
May not include a glob wildcard (*).
Is this something you’d consider supporting in the future, or are there fundamental reasons why it isn’t supported?
My use-case is scanning large jars for classes annotated with a particular annotation, and I’m seeing some OOMs. The annotated classes aren’t necessarily in the same package, but they all follow a naming convention and have the same suffix, so it would be useful to be able to filter for names matching that suffix with something like acceptClasses("*Suffix.class")
.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:8 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Examples of wildcard characters - Microsoft Support
Wildcards are special characters that can stand in for unknown characters in a text value and are handy for locating multiple items with...
Read more >Announcing wildcard support in Amazon EKS Fargate Profile ...
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) now allows you to more easily run workloads from various Kubernetes namespaces on AWS Fargate ...
Read more >Contact - Studio Wildcard
For media and general inquiries, feel free to drop us a line! For job inquiries, please see the Jobs page!
Read more >Supported wildcard for Behavior Monitoring Approved List
Wildcard support in Behavior Monitoring Approved List has been implemented since the following versions: OfficeScan 11.0 Service Pack 1 (SP1) Hot Fix Build ......
Read more >Wildcard Searches SearchBlox supports single and multiple ...
SearchBlox supports single and multiple character wildcard searches. To perform a single character wildcard search, use the “?” symbol.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Yes, that matches the change I tried, thanks!
Thanks for your response, and for the bug report – released as 4.8.111!