[Question] is it possible to work with this.children in stead of wrapping?
See original GitHub issueHi, i’m wondering if you can also use the sortable in the following way in stead of wrapping.
<SortableList onSortEnd={this.handleSort} useDragHandle={true}>
{array.map((value) => {
return (
<SortableElement>
<SortableHandle>::</SortableHandle>
{value}
</SortableElement>
);
})}
</SortableList>
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:5 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
How can I wrap the Children of a Parent component in a HOC ...
Here is a working snippet proves that your problem is not related with the HOC. I've used an array of components instead of...
Read more >Engaging Children in Meaningful Conversation
Ask open-ended questions to challenge children to “go deeper” as they express ideas (e.g., Ask, Why do you think that happened? rather than...
Read more >React Children And Iteration Methods - Smashing Magazine
The problem with using Children methods to change children behavior is that they only work for one level of nesting of components. If...
Read more >Child labor: Facts, FAQs, and how to help end it | World Vision
It hurts so much,” says Nuri, whose fingers are wrapped with dirty bandages. Yet she explains, “I cannot stop working for a second....
Read more >Questions - Dandelion Learning Collaborative
Why Montessori? Montessori learning environments are collaborative, they foster curiosity and cooperation. In this, children are actively engaged in the work of ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Hey @nealoke,
Absolutely! If you’d prefer to use that kind of syntax, you can probably create those yourself by doing something along the lines of:
@clauderic Yes this fixed it 👍 Thank you very much!