Doubt regarding the Hamiltonian calculations for RHVAE model.
See original GitHub issueIn the paper, Hamiltonian is defined as follows:
H(z, v) = U(z) + K(v) = -0.5*log(det(G^-1(z)) + 0.5*v^T*v
But in the code, I see extra terms like addition of a joint probability term and a G inverse multiplied in the term for kinetic energy. Are these 2 equations equivalent?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:12 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
A Geometric Perspective on Variational Autoencoders
In this paper, we propose a geometrical interpretation of the Variational Autoencoder framework. We show that VAEs naturally unveil a Riemannian structure ...
Read more >Hamiltonian Cycle -- from Wolfram MathWorld
A Hamiltonian cycle of a graph can be computed efficiently in the Wolfram ... Golovko (1972) gave a formula giving the number of...
Read more >Hamiltonian path - Wikipedia
In the mathematical field of graph theory, a Hamiltonian path (or traceable path) is a path in an undirected or directed graph that...
Read more >Benchmark VAE - Library for Variational Autoencoder ...
Doubt regarding the Hamiltonian calculations for RHVAE model. In the paper, Hamiltonian is defined as follows:
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
You’re welcome 😃. Not really, you can down-sample a bit your input data to deal with memory issues for instance but, in theory, the VAE can handle any kind of data regardless of the dimension. If you are referring to the paper, we only down-sampled the data by a factor 2 in each dimension when dealing with 3D MRIs.
So are M and G equivalent, since M is also defined as LL^T.