Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
bug: invalid worker names shouldn't be allowed
See original GitHub issueWrangler authentication seems broken. As seen below I’m on .25
⛅️ wrangler 0.0.25
--------------------
✘ [ERROR] Received a bad response from the API
PUT method not allowed for the oauth_token authentication scheme [code: 10000]
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created a year ago
- Comments:12 (9 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Names
So, as a public service, I'm going to list assumptions your systems probably make about names. All of these assumptions are wrong.
Read more >What characters should not be used in ArcGIS for field names ...
Answer. For ArcGIS to work with multiple data types, certain characters in field or table names are not supported. These characters include ...
Read more >COMMON ERRORS IN KRONOS AND HOW TO FIX THEM
TIP: Do a CTRL + Click on the topic to link to the error details ... Employees are not allowed to record their...
Read more >8 - Stack Overflow
Every command I try and run, it fails with that error. I'm on Amazon LightSail... – pee2pee. May 8, 2021 at 18:03.
Read more >Issue with linking an instance name with a dot (like aws.com ...
I can simply create an instance with a different name to make it work, but it shouldn't have allowed me to put invalid...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
The PR didn’t solve the original problem, of using the directory name as the worker name. Reopening.
Marking this for 2.0, it’s likely it’ll confuse a bunch of people if we don’t do this.