Unrecognized labels cancel entire workflow
See original GitHub issueFrom https://github.com/CloudSnorkel/cdk-github-runners/issues/72#issuecomment-1289480905
In your case it sounds like it’s because we expect every job with the
self-hosted
label to also have a label we recognize. It sounds like you have multiple installations ofcdk-github-runners
in different accounts, each implementing different labels. That means some of the installations will not recognize the label and cancel the job. We can probably add a flag to disable this behavior. Let’s do this in a separate ticket.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created a year ago
- Comments:6 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Resource not accessible by integration · Issue #7 - GitHub
I had to generate a personal access token with repo scope in order to cancel workflows properly. See the usage for more details....
Read more >Field Reference - The workflow engine for Kubernetes
WorkflowStatus contains overall status information about a workflow ... recognized schemas to the latest internal value, and may reject unrecognized values.
Read more >IncompatibleWorkflowDefinition when canceling the workflow ...
1 Answer 1 ... Workflow cancelling itself doesn't make sense. It is usually an operation invoked from the outside using the SWF ...
Read more >Types overview | Workflows - Google Cloud
When macro-averaged, the metrics are calculated for each label and then an unweighted ... Recall is the fraction of actual positive labels that...
Read more >Reprint & Cancel Labels | Teapplix Help
For PDF option, you can reprint or cancel labels directly in Teapplix ActionShip. Reprint Entire Batch If you want to reprint an entire...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
😮 thanks @laxgoalie392 - had the same issue - we had pretty weird issues because it even cancelled the jobs for other runners that were not created via this solution …
thanks! i usually just look at the changes in the PR and apply them manually. not a perfect verification method but quickly does a good enough job i think