Make Event an Awaitable[None]
See original GitHub issueMake cocotb.triggers.Event
an Awaitable[None]
. Supply an __await__
implementation that proxies event.wait()
and returns None
.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:10 (10 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
How to make python await for "nothing", running the event ...
Although instead of constantly calling it you may go another way: run your blocking code in another thread using run_in_executor and awaiting ...
Read more >Async/Await - Best Practices in Asynchronous Programming
This article presents nothing new, as the same advice can be found online in ... The differences in semantics make sense for asynchronous...
Read more >Coroutines and Tasks — Python 3.11.1 documentation
Coroutines, Awaitables, Creating Tasks, Task Cancellation, Task Groups, Sleeping, ... import asyncio import time async def say_after(delay, what): await ...
Read more >for await...of - JavaScript - MDN Web Docs
The for await...of statement creates a loop iterating over async iterable ... To make finally blocks of a sync generator always called, ...
Read more >Using async and await — Flask Documentation (2.2.x)
When a request comes in to an async view, Flask will start an event loop in a ... for example to make multiple...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I opened another bug report since the original bug report included the suggestion of deprecating
wait()
, which I don’t think they would ever agree to.Thanks for filing that bpo issue and closing the PR. I’m happy to keep this issue open for now, especially while your new issue on bpo is open.
I don’t understand this argument - if you find yourself trying to add this special case, it means that your caller forgot to call
.wait()
before passing you the object.