Deploy size

• Version (cloudcmd -v): all
• Node Version node -v: ignore
• OS (uname -a on Linux): ignore
• Browser name/version: ignore
• Used Command Line Parameters: ignore
• Changed Config: ignore

I use it as a basic package, but the dependencies in it are so chaotic that the resources deployed are too large.

[root@app01 node_modules]# ll|grep babel
drwxr-xr-x 109 root root  4096 1月   6 15:20 @babel
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root  4096 1月   6 15:20 babel-core
drwxr-xr-x   3 root root  4096 1月   6 15:20 babel-plugin-dynamic-import-node
drwxr-xr-x   4 root root  4096 1月   6 15:20 babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs2
drwxr-xr-x   5 root root  4096 1月   6 15:20 babel-plugin-polyfill-corejs3
drwxr-xr-x   4 root root  4096 1月   6 15:20 babel-plugin-polyfill-regenerator
drwxr-xr-x   3 root root  4096 1月   6 15:20 estree-to-babel

@babel/core is used

[root@app01 node_modules]# npm list @babel/core
webfile@1.0.0 /root/oschina/webfile
└─┬ cloudcmd@14.9.3
  └─┬ putout@9.14.2
    └─┬ @putout/engine-loader@2.2.1
      ├── @babel/core@7.16.7
      └─┬ jscodeshift@0.11.0
        └── @babel/core@7.16.7  de

babel-core is used.

[root@app01 node_modules]# npm list babel-core
webfile@1.0.0 /root/oschina/webfile
└─┬ cloudcmd@14.9.3
  └─┬ putout@9.14.2
    └─┬ @putout/engine-loader@2.2.1
      └─┬ jscodeshift@0.11.0
        └── babel-core@7.0.0-bridge.0

[xuxihai123]

I don’t really need user-defined menu function, but I need to install the whole putout to support it, which sounds too unfriendly.

[coderaiser]

I achieved my goal by copying the source code into the project and removing some code. Of course, it’s ugly.

What kind of code did you removed? How much in size you win?

In addition, I tried user menu on package version 15.9.13 and the latest docker image, and found that this feature is invalid… Maybe I used it improperly.

What exactly didn’t work? Describe steps and errors you find.

Actually every time you renaming a file with F2 key - you are dealing with User Menu 😃, so if it doesn’t work you can rename nothing. User Menu made so people can extend file manager in a way they like. So Cloud Commander was more like a framework.