Better naming for ARM GCC's
See original GitHub issueAt the moment there’s a “ARM gcc 5.4” (arm-linux-gnueabihf
) and “ARM gcc 5.4.1” (arm-none-eabi
) in the list. Both target ARM but on different platforms (linux and bare metal).
It would be useful to have some more distinguished naming here. Maybe using the compiler triplet or “Embedded Linux” / “Embedded”?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:10 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Can anyone explain the gcc cross-compiler naming convention?
The arm-eabi is alike you say, used for Android native apps. One caveat: Debian uses a different naming, just to be difficult, so...
Read more >ARM Compiler armasm User Guide Version 5.06
Symbol naming rules · Symbol names must be unique within their scope. · You can use uppercase letters, lowercase letters, numeric characters, or...
Read more >ARM Options (Using the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC))
This specifies the name of the target ARM architecture. ... For some ARM implementations better performance can be obtained by using this option....
Read more >How to Select the Right Partner for a Global Capability Center ...
Different Criteria to Determine a Right Partner for Your GCC. With GCCs becoming more important in the value hierarchy of an organization, they...
Read more >GCSS-Army - US Army
Training Questions? ... Make sure you include: Your name; Your organization; Your Fielding Group; Your RIC. Inquiries without all of the above ......
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Have a look at https://gcc.godbolt.org/beta/ and see what you think 😃
Oh hi! Sorry, yes we should update these. I’ll take any suggestion that’s succinct – UI pain means it has to fit nicely in the dropdown box 😕