Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Downgrading to JPEG 8
See original GitHub issueHaving JPEG 9 has cause no end of grief lately. Would it be possible for us to downgrade to JPEG 8 so as to match defaults? This would allow our stuff and qt to live in the same environment.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Reactions:4
- Comments:33 (25 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
How to Reduce the Size of a JPEG: 5 Different Ways
1. How to Reduce JPEG Size on Windows. Microsoft Paint is included on any Windows system, so it's a convenient option for making...
Read more >Easy Ways to Reduce a JPEG File Size - TinyIMG
Here are the steps to resize a JPEG file on a Windows 10, 8 or 7 operating system. Open the image in Windows...
Read more >5 Ways to Resize a JPEG - wikiHow
1. Visit an image resizing website. There are tons of websites that will let you quickly upload and resize any image file, including...
Read more >Quickly Reduced JPEG Picture Size without Losing Quality
Compress image size without lossing quality Facebook Page : https://www.facebook.com/MeMJTubeFollow on twitter: ...
Read more >How to reduce JPEG file size on Mac - Setapp
To resize or compress photos with Squash, simply: Launch the app; Drag and drop the images you want resized; Wait for the app...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
@patricksnape at PyCon @jjhelmus, @scopatz, and I had a nice chat with some numfocus people and there is a path to create a conda-forge infrastructure. After PyCon that I had a nice chat with @kwilcox, who will probably attend our next meeting, and he has some very nice ideas on how to achieve that goal.
However, asking for more CI time right now is definitely the way to go! Any other solution will take at best 1-2 months to materialize and conda-forge moves faster than that.
Do you want to take charge of writing Travis-CI and ask for more CI time? (Not sure if we will get anything from AppVeyor as we are already on their best option.)
I can only answer for Linux and Mac: Qt5 takes between 2 to 3 hours on a old (2012) Core i5 using 4 cores.
But the problem is not only time. CircleCI imposes a 4gb limit on space, and that’s way too short for Qt5 (it needs 8 to 10gb).