Stuck on an issue?

Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.

And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.

GitHub API rate limit exceeded for conda-forge-admin

See original GitHub issue

Impressive!

https://travis-ci.org/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/jobs/122659551

Running command: ['python', '/home/travis/build/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/scripts/update_teams.py', './feedstocks_repo/feedstocks']
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/travis/build/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/scripts/update_teams.py", line 105, in <module>
    team._requester.requestJsonAndCheck("PUT", url, input={"permission": "push"})
  File "/home/travis/conda/tmp_envs/0a2f51c4c88b9dcaf16e/lib/python3.5/site-packages/github/Requester.py", line 171, in requestJsonAndCheck
    return self.__check(*self.requestJson(verb, url, parameters, headers, input, cnx))
  File "/home/travis/conda/tmp_envs/0a2f51c4c88b9dcaf16e/lib/python3.5/site-packages/github/Requester.py", line 179, in __check
    raise self.__createException(status, responseHeaders, output)
github.GithubException.GithubException: 403 {'documentation_url': 'https://developer.github.com/v3/#rate-limiting', 'message': 'API rate limit exceeded for conda-forge-admin.'}
CalledProcessError: Command '['python', '/home/travis/build/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/scripts/update_teams.py', './feedstocks_repo/feedstocks']' returned non-zero exit status 1

Looks like that is over 5000 requests an hour! https://developer.github.com/v3/#rate-limiting

Might be that the teams script needs to be a little smarter… 😄

Issue Analytics

State:
Created 7 years ago
Comments:44 (43 by maintainers)

Top GitHub Comments

1reaction

jakirkhamcommented, Aug 23, 2016

Basically we have done quite a bit in the last few months to address this. Going to close it out for now. We can revisit options as they become necessary again.

1reaction

jakirkhamcommented, Jun 1, 2016

Though I should add all of @ericdill’s changes looked sensible to me. I’m sure we could tweak things more, but don’t want to enter the bikesheding domain with this.