Is upload_or_check_non_existence.py needed?
See original GitHub issueI’m trying to understand the purpose of upload_or_check_non_existence.py
. FWICT we may just be better served by setting anaconda_upload
to true
in .condarc
. This will ensure that packages get uploaded. We can configure the token to use when we build. There may be some kinks to work out, but I’d rather spend time doing that than maintaining a nearly identical copy of this functionality in every feedstock.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:12 (12 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Is __init__.py not required for packages in Python 3.3+
It is true that Python 3.3+ supports Implicit Namespace Packages that allows it to create a package without an __init__.py file. This is...
Read more >Do packages really require "__init__.py" ? - Python Forum
No,from Python 3.3+ supports Implicit Namespace Packages that allows to create a package without an __init__.py file. This however only applies ...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
FWIW, I’m keen to move this out of each feedstock too - there is an issue somewhere for it, but I can’t find it right now. The quickest intermediate step is to put the same script (with modifications) into a common repo (
conda-forge-build-setup
?) from which we can get this functionality. Longer-term I’m definitely interested in whether we can achieve the same functionality with conda-build’s upload (when I wrote this, we couldn’t) though.We have moved the upload script to the conda-forge-build-setup.