linter should suggest spdx license string names or warn on them
See original GitHub issueIssue:
Environment (
conda list
):
$ conda list
Details about
conda
and system ( conda info
):
$ conda info
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:5 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Linters | golangci-lint
Name Description Presets Since
asasalint ⚙️ check for pass any as any in variadic func(...any) bugs 1.47.0
bidichk ⚙️ Checks for dangerous unicode character sequences...
Read more >SPDX License List | Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX)
Full name Identifier OSI Approved?
BSD Zero Clause License 0BSD Y
Attribution Assurance License AAL Y
Abstyles License Abstyles
Read more >reuse-tool/CHANGELOG.md at main - GitHub
Better suggestions for faulty SPDX license identifiers in download and init (#416) ... The linter will complain about them, however.
Read more >"SPDX license identifier not provided" warning - Stack Overflow
It's a warning, not an error. So you are able to compile the contract without the license identifier, and it has no effect...
Read more >Release 1.0.0 Free Software Foundation Europe
First, read the REUSE tutorial. In a nutshell: 1. Put your licenses in the LICENSES/ directory. 2. Add a comment header to each...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I think we should have these in the documentation before we lint against them
I don’t feel strongly on this. I’m happy to use them if we can but otherwise not.