Keep license file name from source distribution
See original GitHub issueIssue Description
I noticed when creating a recipe that the upstream repo named the license file LICENSE.md
and grayskull made a copy called LICENSE
. It might be useful to match the naming convention in the upstream repo so that when the license file is eventually included in the upstream repo, there is no need to make changes to the meta.yaml
in addition to deleting the manually packaged copy.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:6 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
setuptools doesn't install licenses · Issue #357
I've tried building a source distribution of my own package with a license_files option and installing it via pip install -U path\to\sdist.tar.gz and...
Read more >Does it matter what I name my open source license file?
If the license is one of the official open source licenses the official license name or its abbreviation may be explicated with the...
Read more >Do I really need to include a licence file for common ...
Of course, if you are distributing the source of a program that is licensed under one of these well-known licenses, then the license...
Read more >[Files] section
This parameter specifies a new name for the file when it is installed on the user's system. By default, Setup uses the name...
Read more >4. Creating a Source Distribution
Just like in the setup script, file and directory names in the manifest template should always be slash-separated; the Distutils will take care...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
The pypi package is
respx
I need to check it, but I think that
grayskull
tries to get it thedev_url
first from the metadata, if it does not exist it uses thepypi
. But I need to check itpip check
test if the whole dependencies of that package are installed, but sometimes it does not work well, but at least it is a second validation if it fails the user can just remove it. I think @ocefpaf can give you a better explanation about it