Timeout and max-depth results
See original GitHub issueIn the current version, hitting either the max-timeout or max-depth limit results in Mythril returning an innocent looking output like this -
{"error": null, "issues": [], "success": true}
Can we please have a separate indicator in the output to suggest that the lack of an issue was because of hitting this limit. Currently, there’s no real way to distinguish between Mythril genuinely not finding a bug vs. Mythril returning “no error” simply because it hit one of these limits.
This, in my opinion, is quite a critical flag to have in the output. I’m not sure, but i thought i had raised this issue a while back. Thanks.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:8
Top Results From Across the Web
Better way to serialize with a timeout in c#.Net - Stack Overflow
Based upon dbc's excellent answer, I managed to create a better timed serializer. It resolves all 3 issues mentioned above:
Read more >Core Options — ScanCode-Toolkit documentation
--timeout Option If some file scan exceeds the specified timeout, that file isn't scanned anymore and the next file scanning starts. This helps...
Read more >[Solved]-Better way to serialize with a timeout in c#.Net-C#
score :0. The correct way to run an action timed would be to do something like ... int maxDepth = 100, int secondsToTimeout...
Read more >WCF and Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to ...
The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use ......
Read more >QUnit.config
hidepassed. Hide results of passed tests (HTML Reporter). QUnit.config.maxDepth. The depth up-to which an object will be ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Priority isn’t yet added, enhancement is just a category in categories like feature, bug, maintainence, … .
This should be resolved with the many changes leading up to 0.20.0. I’m going to close this issue. Feel free to re-open if there are still unresolved problems