Option for showing the plan without applying the script (i.e. dry run)
See original GitHub issueIt would be useful to have an option to skip any confirmation, but answering it as “no”. This would be the opposite of the option --yes
.
My use case is showing the execution plan in a pipeline stage, then stop for manual confirmation.
Terraform has this same concept, with their plan
/apply
commands
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Reactions:8
- Comments:7 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Perform a Terraform Dry Run - Harness.io Docs
For steps on applying plans without a dry run, see Provision using the Terraform Provision Step and Using the Terraform Apply Command.
Read more >Issue a query dry run | BigQuery - Google Cloud
Describes the use of a query dry run and shows how to perform a dry run using the Cloud console, bq command-line, and...
Read more >Internet Explorer (IE) mode troubleshooting and FAQ
Troubleshooting guide and FAQ for Microsoft Edge Internet Explorer mode.
Read more >Terraform Plan Command - Check Your IaC Deployment
This option is useful when automating Terraform scripts, like when run in a CI/CD pipeline. -json. Returns output in JSON format. -no-color.
Read more >Tutorial: Create a simple plan with Bamboo Java Specs
Go to Actions > Configure plan. Check whether the stage contains a job with the Hello world Script task. Select Run > Run...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Hi,
Something along the lines of
--plan-only
then? We were considering dry run to also dump the list of API calls in a file for allowing manual review.Thanks
Hey @marcolink @matthew-contentful @phoebeschmidt @giotiskl Any idea if this is an enhancement to be considered? I can send a PR if it’s something you would like to have in the repo. I also have a need for this and don’t want to maintain my own fork/version of the CLI for this enhancement.