type-enum does NOT work with scoped package names
See original GitHub issuetype-enum does not work if the enum values are scoped packages such @foo/bar
.
Expected Behavior
Commit message such as fix(@foo/bar): fix some bug
should be supported, in a monorepo setting where the repo hosts multiple scoped npm packages.
Current Behavior
It prints a confusing error message: scope must be one of [@foo/bar, ...
. The error message doesn’t say that slashes are used as a delimiter in this rule.
Affected packages
- cli
- core
- prompt
- config-angular
Possible Solution
Do not use slashes as the multi-scope values delimeter.
Steps to Reproduce (for bugs)
- First step
Setup husky to use commitlint as the commit-msg
hook in the repo root’s package.json
:
// in package.json
"husky": {
"hooks": {
"commit-msg": "commitlint -E HUSKY_GIT_PARAMS"
}
},
- Second step
Use the following commitlint config:
commitlint.config.js
module.exports = {
rules: {
'scope-enum': [2, 'always', '@foo/bar'],
},
};
Try to do a commit with commit message fix(@foo/bar): fix some bug
.
Context
Our repo https://github.com/formatjs/formatjs is a monorepo that hosts the source code multiple packages. Most of the packages are scoped to @formatjs/
. We use the scope-enum linter rule to ensure that each commit correctly specify the affected packages. This information is critical because we use Lerna to version and publish the packages, and Lerna reads these commit messages for semantic versioning.
Your Environment
Executable | Version |
---|---|
commitlint --version |
9.1.2 |
git --version |
2.25.0 |
node --version |
14.9.0 |
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Reactions:3
- Comments:6 (1 by maintainers)
Top GitHub Comments
@pyrocat101 I think this issue can be resolved using my plugin
commitlint-plugin-function-rules
.Using the plugin, you can write something like this as commitlint config. Hope this helps!
@escapedcat I think this plugin should be part of the main code. It should be allowed to define a custom rule based on a function, what do you think?