feat: questionnaire validation
See original GitHub issueI’d love a possibility to validate questionnaire inputs. Being able to validate str
against regex would already be a huge help, e.g. by specifying a field appropriately in copier.yml
:
project_name:
type: str
help: Your project name
validate: ^[a-zA-Z][_a-zA-Z0-9]+$
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Reactions:16
- Comments:16 (13 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Validating a Questionnaire - Methodspace
Validating a Questionnaire · Generally speaking the first step in validating a survey is to establish face validity. · The second step is...
Read more >Development and validation of a new tool for the assessment ...
The new questionnaire, based on empirical research and bedside experience, showed good psychometric properties and clinical applicability.
Read more >Validation of the professional identity questionnaire among ...
Hence in this study, we investigate the validity and reliability of using Brown et al.'s [1986] Professional Identity Questionnaire (PIQ) to ...
Read more >Development and Psychometric Validation of the Music ...
The Music Perception Ability Questionnaire was developed to assess the general perception ability of non-musicians and enable them to assess their music ...
Read more >What Is a Questionnaire and How Is It Used in Research? - Cint
A questionnaire is a research tool featuring a series of questions used ... they may offer inaccurate answers that can impact data validity....
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@yajo, @pawamoy: I have a possible fix for the test failures in #785. See PR #804.
Correct!
Another example: