Missing relationship attributes on external links
See original GitHub issueWhere to find the issue
FAQ
Problem and suggested change
This issue was brought up by @MikeMcC399 in recently submitted PR #3030
There has never been a written policy here about external links but for consistency rel='noopener noreferrer'
would need to be added to ensure security for external links, such as
<a href='https://tools.rki.de/PLZTool/en-GB' target='_blank'>Robert Koch Institute Tool: Health authority by postal code or place</a>
Internal Tracking ID: EXPOSUREAPP-13638
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created a year ago
- Comments:6 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Links in HTML documents - W3C
This attribute describes the relationship from the current document to the anchor specified by the href attribute. The value of this attribute is...
Read more >HTML attribute: rel - HTML: HyperText Markup Language | MDN
The rel attribute defines the relationship between a linked resource and the current document. Valid on , , , and , the supported...
Read more >How to add a rel attribute to all links in WordPress - SupportHost
The rel attribute that we are going to insert in the links, allow us to indicate relationships with the link's landing page.
Read more >How to Add Nofollow Links in WordPress (Beginner's Guide)
To add the nofollow attribute, just type nofollow in the Link Relationship (XFN) textbox. You can also check the 'Open link in a...
Read more >External Linking SEO Strategy – Best Practice in 2023
In this tutorial I will try to explain the benefit of external linking and how you can use them to increase chances to...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@larswmh
Will you implement this change? It seems like you are quite good with Regex 🙂 !