Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Different output format results in different coverage percentage
See original GitHub issueI would have assumed that the code coverage output format ist just that - a file format. But it seems like using a different output format also affects code coverage percentage. Is this by design?
Example:
I use a .NET regular expression source generator in my code.
When I use dotnet test with the argument --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage;Format=cobertura" then it does count the generated code in the namespace System.Text.RegularExpressions.Generated.
When I use dotnet test with the argument --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage;Format=opencover" then it does not count the generated code.
Package: coverlet.collector 6.0.0 .NET 7
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created a month ago
- Comments:8
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
@danielpalme You can find the Cobertura (and OpenCover) file here: https://github.com/coverlet-coverage/coverlet/issues/1519#issuecomment-1676447115
Thanks for the analysis. I’ll test this again in a few days.