Thread solids invalid
See original GitHub issueThread solids are not valid, and consequently fail boolean operations.
>>> import cqparts
>>> thread = cqparts.types.threads.iso_262.ISO262Thread().make(5)
>>> thread.val().wrapped.isValid()
False
solids can be cleaned up using the method(s) described here, but they’re not always successful.
slight variations initially yield an unclosed solid, but are fixed with sewShape()
, for example
>>> import cqparts
>>> thread = cqparts.types.threads.iso_262.ISO262Thread(pitch=0.7).make(3)
>>> thread.val().wrapped.isValid()
True
Exception
code modified to crash more gracefully by raising:
SolidValidityError: created thread solid cannot be made watertight
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:8 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Error: volume-integrals: invalid thread - Forums - CFD Online
Simulating a solid heat sink which contains phase change material and air. volume fraction of pcm is 0.3. Employed VOF model.
Read more >SOLIDWORKS Tutorial - How to Fix Missing Cosmetic Threads
For parts and assemblies, the main things to check are the Detailing settings in the Document Properties, as well as the View -...
Read more >Cross-thread operation not valid [duplicate] - Stack Overflow
Okay, I know why this is giving me this error: Cross-thread operation not valid: Control 'Form1' accessed from a thread other than the...
Read more >Draw symmetries invalid thread - Ansys Learning Forum
Hello everyone ! I'm writing this topic because I'm using ANSYS Fluent for a project and when I changed the name of my...
Read more >Invalid memory ordering in thread park / unpark #53366 - GitHub
I'm pretty sure that the memory orderings uses in the thread park / unpark are incorrect. They happen to work on x86 due...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
This bug is making thread-building completely unmanageable. It’s making building a very painful and error-prone experience… the presence of thread faces makes
cqparts
very unstable.Mitigated by Simplifying to Cylinder
For the time being, I’ve converted the base
Thread
type to aPart
so I can exploit the_simple=True
flag, which causes themake_simple()
method to build the part’s.local_obj
as opposed to.make()
. (see f1e98fe)In other words, by default, threads are not generated. Instead they are replaced with a cylinder with the thread’s average radius
(outer + inner) / 2
.Workaround
If you’d like to play with real threads, you can turn off default simplification with any of…
none of the above methods are permanent, please keep this in mind if you’re planning a future-proofed script.
Fix Delay
I also won’t have time to fix this for the initial release… but it’s very high on the priorities list after v0.2
Task
cqparts_fasteners
README.rst