doodle_2.13 artifact is empty
See original GitHub issueHello, the artifact org.creativescala::doodle:0.9.25
is empty (only contains the manifest file). Is this intented ?
Here is the Maven Search Page
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:10 (8 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Untitled
Il significato della vita di pi, Kim so eun di horse doctor, 13th century german architecture, ... Doodle 2 flipkart, Itunes singer songwriter...
Read more >Artifacts - Warehouse 13 Wiki - Fandom
Artifacts are mysterious relics, fantastical objects, and supernatural souvenirs that are packed with enough energy to somehow move and affect other objects ...
Read more >Custom Maven Plugin development - getArtifacts is empty ...
getArtifacts() is always empty, though I am able to see the MavenProject.getDependencies() returning the required list of dependencies.
Read more >Fossil Watch Vector Free | AI, SVG and EPS | Page 4 - Vector.me
Free Fossil Watch vector download in AI, SVG, EPS and CDR. Browse our Fossil Watch images, graphics, and designs from +79.322 free vectors...
Read more >Untitled
First muslim in uk, Whale's rib, L'172-13, 77 coral acres drive, Como funciona o ... Yakiri rubio asesina, Midland news classifieds, Zotero library...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
I’ve published a 0.10.0 snapshot and it looks like the POM contains the dependencies as expected. E.g. https://oss.sonatype.org/service/local/repositories/releases/content/org/creativescala/doodle_2.13/0.10.0/doodle_2.13-0.10.0.pom
At the time of writing it hasn’t been synced to Maven.
Let me know if this doesn’t for you and I’ll … well, I’m not sure what I’ll do.
I don’t think
pomIncludeRepository
is relevant here.I’ve submitted what I thiiiiink is a fix at #108