Unit tests coverage for properties helpers
See original GitHub issueSome classes in the com.crowdin.cli.properties
namespace have low coverage by Unit tests. It would be great to add Unit tests for these classes.
- PropertiesBuilders.java
- BasePropertiesBuilder.java
- PropertiesWithTargets.java
- ProjectPropertiesBuilder.java
- PropertiesBuilderChecker.java
- PropertiesWithTargetsBuilder.java
Similar tests for reference can be found here
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created a year ago
- Comments:29 (28 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Use code coverage for unit testing - .NET | Microsoft Learn
Code coverage is a measurement of the amount of code that is run by unit tests - either lines, branches, or methods.
Read more >Why does this unit test not cover my property setter?
I am writing unit test cases using NUnit. While testing this property I get coverage for the getter, but not the setter. Why?...
Read more >Coverage analysis of unit tests - dotCover - JetBrains
dotCover helps discover and run, debug or cover unit tests right in Visual Studio or using the command-line utility. The following unit testing ......
Read more >How do I increase my code coverage, or why can't I cover ...
Fundamentally, to increase your code coverage, you must write functional unit tests for code paths that are not currently covered.
Read more >Need help for Unit Test Code coverage for SonarCloud
Hi Team, I am working on dotnet project and I was able to successfully generate sonar cloud scan analysis report from Azure DevOps...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Hi @DukeRino7, awesome, thanks a lot for the contribution!
Briefly looked over the PR and it looks good to me. I’ll review it in more detail tomorrow and then will merge it. Thanks!
@DukeRino7 great, thanks for the update!