Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
[idea] easy-peasy-core without the react binding to create redux store in other framework
See original GitHub issueLove the easy workflow this library providing. I would like to use it in other framework like polymer and LitElement. Since the store this library is generating pretty much just a redux store, I see a high chance of compatibility. The architecture question would be that if it is better to have a easy-peasy-core and a easy-peasy-react hooks binding library. Maybe easy-easy-angular too?
That way I can just import the core library without the react stuff when I use it in the Polymer/LitElement framework.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:7 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
@ctrlplusb Here’s the repo: https://github.com/CyriacBr/easy-peasy-packages. I published
@easy-peasy/coreand@easy-peasy/react. Respective tests pass so far. I’ve used core in my project just now and all seem good.Btw, I tried to convert the react part of your lib in typescript but wow, it wasn’t an easy task. I gave up at a point. When I’ll work on the vue connector I’ll see if I can correctly leverage your types to provide a full TS codebase.
No problem. Thanks for checking with me. 💜