Move to integration domain key
See original GitHub issueAccording to this ADR 0007, we should move mitemp_bt to the integration domain key.
New integrations have to put the integration configuration section under the integration domain key if configuration YAML is used.
If I understand it correctly, we should move to the following.
# Allowed
mitemp_bt:
rounding: True
etc.
# Not allowed
sensor:
- platform: mitemp_bt
rounding: True
etc.
It’s not a big deal if we don’t do this, but if we want to follow the guidelines, I think we should change this some day.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:48
Top Results From Across the Web
How to Create, Configure and Set Up DKIM in 3 Easy Steps
Clear 3-step instructions to help you set up DKIM. We explain how to create the public / private key pair, configuring DNS records,...
Read more >Managing DKIM - Oracle Help Center
Manage email domains with Domain Keys Identified Mail (DKIM). DKIM is an authentication framework that allows verification of the source and ...
Read more >DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) integration - Forcepoint
1. Click Add in the DKIM Signing Keys section to open the Add Signing Key page. · 2. Enter a name for your...
Read more >Importing a domain key - TechDocs
To import a domain key · In the Control Center, click. Administration > Settings > Certificates . · Click the. Domain Keys. tab....
Read more >How to Create a DKIM Record and Add it to DNS | Mailtrap Blog
To create a DKIM record you need to generate the public and private keys and allocate them properly. Explore the details in this...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Good news, thank you. We can make a preliminary announcement on the forum also.
I propose I ask ludeeus tomorrow, and depending on the answer we decide what to do next.
I’ve updated the code to use
ble_monitor
right now, but we can change that tomorrow. After the answer, I will update the docs and prepare a 0.8.1 beta release, after your approval.But for now, I’m going to bed.