Chainer descendants not found
See original GitHub issueIs this a Feature or Bug?
Bug
Current behavior:
Spits out error
CypressError: The chainer: 'descendants' was not found. Could not build assertion.
How to reproduce:
Add a spec with:
.should("have.descendants", ".some-selector")
Test code:
.should("have.descendants", ".some-selector")
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:8 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
"match.text" chainer not found - cypress - Stack Overflow
But as of now, I am getting the error "The chainer text was not found. Could not build assertion" and What am I...
Read more >chainer.Chain — Chainer 7.8.1 documentation
The name of the link is reset on the copy, since the copied instance does not belong to the original parent chain (even...
Read more >chainer.Link — Chainer 7.8.1 documentation
This method returns a context manager object that enables registration of parameters (and links for Chain ) by an assignment. A Parameter object...
Read more >chainer.Sequential — Chainer 7.8.1 documentation
A Sequential calls the given callable objects sequentially inside of the forward() method in the same order as the given arguments. Therefore, you...
Read more >Chainer Documentation
NumPy based syntax for working with arrays, thanks to CuPy implementation ... If CUDA is not found, get_array_module() function always ... its descendants....
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
We rewrote chai-jquery in 0.20.0 and during that time we misspelled the word. It works right now as
descendents
but we’ll update this to the proper spelling and get it out in the next patch release.Perhaps we could do a levenshtein check to do the "Did you mean ‘…’ suggestion
Fixed in
0.20.1
.