Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Support for test.fail
See original GitHub issueWhat would you like?
A way to specify a test must fail. That, vs .skip would be similar to @ts-expect-error vs @ts-ignore.
It can be similar to Playwright, which supports a test.fail() function to be called in test. It can also be test.fail or test.failing, similar to how jest supports it.
Why is this needed?
If .skip is used to exclude a test that is meant to capture a bug that is supposed to be fixed at some point, it’s easy to forget about removing .skip annotation when the bug is fixed.
Other
Not sure if it should be a feature request here or on Mocha.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created a year ago
- Comments:8 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
Just add .skip and TODO comment and link jira issue 📈
Thanks for you suggestions @lmiller1990. I agree it makes more sense to be a feature in Mocha.