question-mark
Stuck on an issue?

Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.

And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.

Get Weird Structure in Reproducing the Result of GDAS-FRC

See original GitHub issue

Hello . ​Using script NASNet-space-search-by-GDAS-FRC.sh, I got a weird structure as below, which is totally different from cell reported from GDAS Paper(figure 4). The command I use is:

CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0 bash ./scripts-search/NASNet-space-search-by-GDAS-FRC.sh cifar10 1 -1

Structure in paper: FRC Weird Structure I got:

{'normal': [
    (('skip_connect', 1, 0.1485183) , ('dua_sepc_5x5', 0, 0.13894983)), 
    (('skip_connect', 1, 0.15187271), ('avg_pool_3x3', 1, 0.14358662)), 
    (('skip_connect', 1, 0.14807169), ('max_pool_3x3', 1, 0.14803562)),
    (('max_pool_3x3', 1, 0.15954553), ('skip_connect', 1, 0.14276329))], 
'normal_concat': [2, 3, 4, 5]}

​To find out whether it is only a outlier, I repeat searching procedure several times using different seeds. All result is similar to this weird structure. In these found structures, only one edge containing conv operator and others edges are all ‘skip_connect’ or pooling operator.

MY Environment is :

  • NVIDIA-SMI 415.27
  • CUDA 10.0
  • Python 3.7.7
  • cudatoolkit 10.0.130
  • cudnn 7.6.5
  • Pytorch 1.4.0
  • torchvision 0.5.0

Issue Analytics

  • State:open
  • Created 3 years ago
  • Comments:5 (2 by maintainers)

github_iconTop GitHub Comments

4reactions
D-X-Ycommented, Oct 23, 2020

{‘normal’: [((‘skip_connect’, 1, 0.15519889), (‘dil_sepc_5x5’, 0, 0.1416643)), ((‘skip_connect’, 1, 0.15950418), (‘max_pool_3x3’, 1, 0.1456287)), ((‘skip_connect’, 1, 0.15625753), (‘max_pool_3x3’, 1, 0.1543942)), ((‘max_pool_3x3’, 1, 0.15630342), (‘skip_connect’, 1, 0.15141682))], ‘normal_concat’: [2, 3, 4, 5]}

Here are my searched results… I also get the same problem. I will try to figure out.

0reactions
kadiraltugcommented, Aug 8, 2022

Hello .​Using script NASNet-space-search-by-GDAS-FRC.sh, I got a weird structure as below, which is totally different from cell reported from GDAS Paper(figure 4). The command I use is:

CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0 bash ./scripts-search/NASNet-space-search-by-GDAS-FRC.sh cifar10 1 -1

Structure in paper: FRC Weird Structure I got:

{'normal': [
    (('skip_connect', 1, 0.1485183) , ('dua_sepc_5x5', 0, 0.13894983)), 
    (('skip_connect', 1, 0.15187271), ('avg_pool_3x3', 1, 0.14358662)), 
    (('skip_connect', 1, 0.14807169), ('max_pool_3x3', 1, 0.14803562)),
    (('max_pool_3x3', 1, 0.15954553), ('skip_connect', 1, 0.14276329))], 
'normal_concat': [2, 3, 4, 5]}

​To find out whether it is only a outlier, I repeat searching procedure several times using different seeds. All result is similar to this weird structure. In these found structures, only one edge containing conv operator and others edges are all ‘skip_connect’ or pooling operator.

MY Environment is :

  • NVIDIA-SMI 415.27
  • CUDA 10.0
  • Python 3.7.7
  • cudatoolkit 10.0.130
  • cudnn 7.6.5
  • Pytorch 1.4.0
  • torchvision 0.5.0

How can u use this codes in your code?

Read more comments on GitHub >

github_iconTop Results From Across the Web

Geometry library — PHIDL documentation
The pg.ring() function creates a ring. The radius refers to the center radius of the ring structure (halfway between the inner and outer...
Read more >
Disappearing cells in merged layout · Issue #589 - GitHub
Here are the steps to reproduce the problem, which results in the screenshot below: open the above GDS; In the Cell window, right...
Read more >
Error while creating an in-memory graph in neo4j
I am currently trying to reproduce an example from the graph data science developer guide but i am getting an weird error when...
Read more >
Global disease score (GDS) is the name of the game!
In this editorial, we argue that the global disease score (GDS) is this ... appear before structural tissue changes become detectable (Fig.
Read more >
Inverse design of y-branch: 2.5D optimized Geometry & GDS ...
I could reproduce the issue with the varFDTD optimization. Something is going wrong when generating the polygon from the optimization results.
Read more >

github_iconTop Related Medium Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related StackOverflow Question

No results found

github_iconTroubleshoot Live Code

Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free

github_iconTop Related Reddit Thread

No results found

github_iconTop Related Hackernoon Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related Tweet

No results found

github_iconTop Related Dev.to Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related Hashnode Post

No results found