[RFC] Remove the GitHub Action
See original GitHub issueDescribe the bug
This repo opted into GitHub Actions as an “action” back during the alpha phase.
I don’t think I thought enough about the repercussions, the CI for other takes much longer and is less predictable. I think it’s just a much worse version of npx danger ci
and we should probably stop making this repo show up as a GitHub Action.
This also means updating some docs, and I think there are recommendations in the errors which use the action syntax.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:8 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
RFC: Remove resources based on github issue/PR/branch · Issue ...
RFC : Remove resources based on github issue/PR/branch #45 ... on the merge commit, github actions, etc) and none are particularly consistent or...
Read more >[RFC] Use Github Actions for StackStorm-Exchange CI and ...
To test, I forked the index and made the gha branch the default branch. In the gha branch there is a simple workflow...
Read more >Remove team restriction from RFC process documentation ... - GitHub
A fast, small, safe, gradually typed embeddable scripting language derived from Lua - Remove team restriction from RFC process documentation ...
Read more >Removing workflow artifacts - GitHub Enterprise Cloud Docs
Under your repository name, click Actions. Actions tab in the main repository navigation. In the left sidebar, click the workflow you want to...
Read more >Issue #390 · tlienart/Franklin.jl - [RFC] GitHub actions
If you do # not, then you can remove the `run: pip install matplotlib` line. - name: Install python uses: actions/setup-python@v1 with: ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I also think it’s a bad abstraction in danger-swift too, you can’t share the build phase at all and so the problem is exacerbated over there with danger taking many minutes to be used. I almost unilaterally recommend that people never use the actions IRL.
The biggest advantage is that it can have danger-js etc all set up ahead of time
I don’t think it’s about removing the docker support, that’s tangential - people are free to set stuff up how they like. If they’re using docker, then they are already used to slow builds. Today people think that the actions are the first thing you should use, and that’s a worse experience then just doing Danger with the rest of your project.
I’ve hit the button to delist it, existing workflows will still “work” but folks won’t find it in the future