question-mark
Stuck on an issue?

Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.

And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.

[RFC] Remove the GitHub Action

See original GitHub issue

Describe the bug

This repo opted into GitHub Actions as an “action” back during the alpha phase.

I don’t think I thought enough about the repercussions, the CI for other takes much longer and is less predictable. I think it’s just a much worse version of npx danger ci and we should probably stop making this repo show up as a GitHub Action.

This also means updating some docs, and I think there are recommendations in the errors which use the action syntax.

Issue Analytics

  • State:closed
  • Created 3 years ago
  • Comments:8 (7 by maintainers)

github_iconTop GitHub Comments

2reactions
ortacommented, May 8, 2020

I also think it’s a bad abstraction in danger-swift too, you can’t share the build phase at all and so the problem is exacerbated over there with danger taking many minutes to be used. I almost unilaterally recommend that people never use the actions IRL.

The biggest advantage is that it can have danger-js etc all set up ahead of time

I don’t think it’s about removing the docker support, that’s tangential - people are free to set stuff up how they like. If they’re using docker, then they are already used to slow builds. Today people think that the actions are the first thing you should use, and that’s a worse experience then just doing Danger with the rest of your project.

1reaction
ortacommented, Feb 1, 2022

I’ve hit the button to delist it, existing workflows will still “work” but folks won’t find it in the future

Read more comments on GitHub >

github_iconTop Results From Across the Web

RFC: Remove resources based on github issue/PR/branch · Issue ...
RFC : Remove resources based on github issue/PR/branch #45 ... on the merge commit, github actions, etc) and none are particularly consistent or...
Read more >
[RFC] Use Github Actions for StackStorm-Exchange CI and ...
To test, I forked the index and made the gha branch the default branch. In the gha branch there is a simple workflow...
Read more >
Remove team restriction from RFC process documentation ... - GitHub
A fast, small, safe, gradually typed embeddable scripting language derived from Lua - Remove team restriction from RFC process documentation ...
Read more >
Removing workflow artifacts - GitHub Enterprise Cloud Docs
Under your repository name, click Actions. Actions tab in the main repository navigation. In the left sidebar, click the workflow you want to...
Read more >
Issue #390 · tlienart/Franklin.jl - [RFC] GitHub actions
If you do # not, then you can remove the `run: pip install matplotlib` line. - name: Install python uses: actions/setup-python@v1 with: ...
Read more >

github_iconTop Related Medium Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related StackOverflow Question

No results found

github_iconTroubleshoot Live Code

Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free

github_iconTop Related Reddit Thread

No results found

github_iconTop Related Hackernoon Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related Tweet

No results found

github_iconTop Related Dev.to Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related Hashnode Post

No results found