[Feature Request] Support port 80
See original GitHub issueI want
www.example.com
to be normal (i.e. port 80)www.example.com:5000
to be darkfoo.example.com
to be dark
So I use the blacklist (“Not invert list”), and add www.example:com:80
.
I expect that everything will be dark, except port 80.
But it doesn’t work - the :80
port is ignored. Therefore www.example.com
is dark.
I think www.example.com:80
is treated the same as www.example.com
. But they are different - if port 80 is specified it should take precedence.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:6 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Support for ports other than 80 and 443 - Feature Requests
I'd like to see the client become a service running in the background on it's own port(s) and simply requesting/renewing certificates as ...
Read more >[Feature Request] Change service port at installation. · Issue #18
Our 80 port is already in use by a webservice, due to this reason, I tried to change default port 80 without success......
Read more >Port 80 Redirect - No-IP
Port 80 redirect is a useful feature provided by No-IP.com. ... It is very common for Internet Service Providers (ISP) to block all...
Read more >“Strict” HTTPS-only mode - Cloudflare Community
(That rule has a HTTP firewall block on all ports except 80 and 443). I believe Workers will support pure TCP applications in...
Read more >How to Redirect Requests on Port 80 to 443 Using the ...
Complete the following steps to redirect requests on port 80 to 443 using the Redirect URL feature on NetScaler: Log on to the...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I will look into the code to handle ports a little better cannot guarantee anything
Oh so sorry for the late reaction I think this is problem/feauture that Can’t be added or the way that URL behave needs to change but as this is how browsers handles with common ports, I close this feature request as it for right now to possible. If you think otherwise as their might be an extension API I didn’t know of Feel free to comment.
Thank you for your contributions to Darkreader 😄