Custom readers for dask_image using pims
See original GitHub issueHi, I wanted to raise the request to have a way to incorporate custom readers using pims
as described here.
My specific use case is I often work with FITS format files. It’s pretty straightforward to write a custom reader that works with pims.open()
, but it seems that currently with dask_images.imread.imread()
, the pims.open()
call does not find a new reader. This may just be a scope issue; I’ve been playing around with this in a Jupyter notebook so far.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:7 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Using Dask and napari to process & view large datasets
We can create a Dask array of delayed file-readers for all of the files in our ... Using dask-image , all of the...
Read more >Read images from cloud storage · Issue #84 - GitHub
I was wondering what the relationship between this package and the function dask.array.image.imread that's already part of dask.
Read more >dask-image Documentation
Alternatively, you can install dask-image with pip: ... reduced overhead of pim.open calls when reading from image sequence (#182).
Read more >Performing HOG Matrices on PIMS Chunks through ImageIO
Hello everyone! I'm in the process of trying to get something running through Dask and PIMS. We're adapting code from a different lab...
Read more >dask-image - PyPI
Supports reading of image files into Dask. Provides basic N-D filters with options to extend. Provides a few N-D Fourier filters. Provides a...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
The upstream issue is now fixed thanks to @astrophysaxist . See ( https://github.com/imageio/imageio/pull/637 )
Ah ok. Thanks for narrowing that down @astrophysaxist 😄
Let’s go ahead and close here since it is an upstream issue. Though will keep an eye on that issue for updates 🙂