Unified test suite
See original GitHub issueAfter we figure out CI testing in #2 we might consider refactoring the test suite into a unified TestCase
class for common functionality.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:7 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Importance and Benefits of Unified Testing Framework
A unified testing framework or approach, along with a built-in test management system, can let tests be updated continuously and help the stakeholders...
Read more >Unified Test Automation Suite - Sailoconnect
Our unified test automation suite serves as an all-encompassing platform which handles advanced testing in an efficient manner.
Read more >7 Reasons Why the Unified Test Automation Framework is ...
Read our blog to learn why the Unified Test Automation frameworks is ready to take over and transform your QA process.
Read more >On Building a Unified Test Automation Framework | Medium
Test automation comes to give more confidence to the team to deliver software changes at an accelerated rate, automating a set of verification....
Read more >Automate Functional Testing from UI to the API | UFT One
Simplifies multilayer testing with a visual test-driven design. Manages API testing at the headless layer without extensive coding. Read case study
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Given that we will be using pytest we can probably at least avoid the self.assertFoo methods 😃
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 11:07 AM, jakirkham notifications@github.com wrote:
I’m not sure how much reuse there is though. This might or might not make sense.