Should we create a `dask.ml` namespace?
See original GitHub issueFor dask.distributed we created a namespace in the dask
so that people stopped calling import distributed
. This was also nice because it makes things feel a bit more integrated
from dask.distributed import Client # <--- actually imports from a separate distributed module
Should we do the same for other libraries? Dask_ml seems like a good candidate to test this.
This is the relevant file in the dask library: https://github.com/dask/dask/blob/master/dask/distributed.py
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:13 (9 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Dask-ML — dask-ml 2022.5.28 documentation
Dask -ML provides scalable machine learning in Python using Dask alongside popular machine learning libraries like Scikit-Learn, XGBoost, and others. You can ...
Read more >Scaling behavior permission in namespace issues #55 - GitHub
The dask-kubernetes project requires that you have permissions to start, stop, and list pods in the specified namespace. My guess is that you ......
Read more >Simplify Dask Deployments with Tanzu Kubernetes Grid and ...
If you have a K8s cluster available, here are the steps you'll need to deploy Dask on it: Create a K8s namespace to...
Read more >A First Look at Dask on ARM on K8s | Scaling Python ML
The dask-docker project gives us a good starting point for building a container for Dask, but the project's containers are only built for...
Read more >dask/dask - Gitter
Are dask -ml estimators supporting dask dataframes now? they only support dask ... Should I use Pandas or Dask instead of Spark to...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Wow. Those are both slick implementations.
I think that we can safely progress beyond the question of “if we can do this” to “should we do this”
Whoops. I meant https://github.com/dask/dask/pull/6384