stack/concatenate duplicates last result in list comprehension
See original GitHub issueAm running into some strange behavior with Dask stack
and concatenate
where they end up duplicating the last value in a list comprehension for all other values in the stacked or concatenated array. Not seeing this across the board, but am seeing it reliably in a few cases. Not sure if there is some optimization gone awry or something else giving rise to this problem. Have documented it in issue ( https://github.com/dask-image/dask-ndfilters/issues/28 ) with an example and specs for reproducing the issue.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:6 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Concatenate two lists by list comprehension Python [duplicate]
It works as others explained, but it's a weird way to concatenate two lists. You can just use the + operator, or list.extend()...
Read more >How to Convert List to String in Python? - Simplilearn
The list comprehension will traverse the elements one by one, and the join() method will concatenate the list's elements into a new string ......
Read more >Python | Merge two list of lists according to first element
Method #1: Python zip() with list comprehension. Python3 ... Python | Combine two lists by maintaining duplicates in first list.
Read more >5. Data Structures — Python 3.11.1 documentation
List comprehensions provide a concise way to create lists. Common applications are to make new lists where each element is the result of...
Read more >60 Questions to Test Your Knowledge of Python Lists
By default, pop removes the last element from a list if an index isn't specified. 10. Remove duplicates from a list. If you're...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Ah, yes, if you provide a
name
you take on the responsibility of hashing the arguments and need to make sure it’s unique. I can see the desire for only specifying the prefix though. I’ll add a keyword (da.atop
usestoken
) for that and clarify the docs.See #2383.