Does spark DataFrame.limit guarantees any order?
See original GitHub issueThis is just a question, not an issue.
Out of curiosity, does spark.DataFrame.limit guarantees the order ?
That method is used to implement many methods like .head
, .iloc
In pandas the data is small and the order could be guaranteed. But in koalas, the data is distributed. Is it guaranteed those methods would keep order?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:7 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Why does df.limit keep changing in Pyspark? - Stack Overflow
The LIMIT clause is used to constrain the number of rows returned by the SELECT statement. In general, this clause is used in...
Read more >sort() vs orderBy() in Spark - Towards Data Science
Both sort() and orderBy() functions can be used to sort Spark DataFrames on at least one column and any desired order, namely ascending...
Read more >[#SPARK-16207] order guarantees for DataFrames - ASF JIRA
There's no clear explanation in the documentation about what guarantees are available for the preservation of order in DataFrames.
Read more >Using the Spark Connector - Snowflake Documentation
From Spark SQL to Snowflake ... Limits. Projections. Sorts (ORDER BY). Union and Union All ... Window Functions (note: these do not work...
Read more >Spark SQL Aggregate Functions
Spark SQL provides built-in standard Aggregate functions defines in DataFrame API, these come in handy when we need to make aggregate ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Yes, it’s a bit questionable at this moment. Maybe we should do one of these: …
Yes, that’s correct 😃.