Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Panda's `from_records` missing in Koalas
See original GitHub issueThe equivalent of from_records in Pandas is missing in Koalas (unlike the description in https://github.com/databricks/koalas/blob/0ef453b4ed1add1d3468eb3742333d06228d6e24/databricks/koalas/frame.py#L1429, which hints that it should be available along with to_records).
It would be a useful addition to Koalas package (or at the least, the commentary should be updated to say that from_records is in the works rather than “See Also”).
I was using the latest Koalas version (0.6.0).
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:5 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
This will be virtually
ks.DataFrame(pd.from_records). should be easy to add.BTW,
to_recordsis close to violate https://github.com/databricks/koalas#guardrails-to-prevent-users-from-shooting-themselves-in-the-foot . We might have to deprecate it in the future.Thank you @HyukjinKwon and @floscha for taking care of this