Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
MD029 Allow repeating zero's
See original GitHub issueParameters: style (“one”, “ordered”; default “one”)
In addition to “one” and “ordered” may we also have a “zero” option? In my personal opinion, using a zero is a better hint to the author and/or reader that using the 0/0/0 pattern is intentional (in anticipation of parsers that auto-number) and I’ve written many docs as such.
A different implementation might be to support any repeating number (n/n/n) with a consistent option but I can’t imagine a scenario someone wanting to use a different number than zero or one.
Thoughts? Too edge-case?
This example is the closest reference I could find in the commonmark spec.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:6 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
Should be in the next round of updates!
Ah yes, good point, I wasn’t looking at the linter in the right way there, but I totally see what you mean. I’d still love to see zeroes as a common special case though. 😃