rule MD034 flags URL in `Inline code` with backticks as "bare url"
See original GitHub issueA URL inside of an inline code
with backticks is marked as a “bare url” by markdownlint.
My editor is vscode.
Example:
git clone https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow.git
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:6 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Pasted inline code (via Markdown-style backticks) renders ...
Hi! One thing I like about Confluence is that I can paste in Markdown and it renders correctly (mostly). I know it's probably...
Read more >Markdown Lint Tool Documentation (Book Edition)
A tool to check markdown files and flag style issues. Contents. Introduction ... MD033 - Inline HTML; MD034 - Bare URL used; MD035...
Read more >How do I escape a backtick ` within in-line code in Markdown?
For showing backticks inside inline codeblocks `table_name` , use double backticks with extra ... Escaped codeblock, italics, bold, link, headings and list:.
Read more >How to render triple backticks as inline code block in ...
The Syntax Rules are very clear about this: To include a literal backtick character within a code span, you can use multiple backticks...
Read more >markdownlint vscode - CSDN
MD034 无裸URL-使用裸URL. MD035 hr样式-水平规则样式 ... MD041第一行标题/first-line-h1-文件中的第一行应该是顶级标题. MD042无空链接-无空链接.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
By the way, I am one failing a test case away from improving MD033 in an upcoming commit. It should handle a few more scenarios and highlight better very soon!
That’s great to know, thank you both! I think the error and line number are correct, but the highlighting is wrong. I will leave this issue open to look into that.
Some background, in case you are interested: Some rules identify the range themselves and should usually be correct. There are some cases where the VS Code extension does its own range calculation and those are less reliable because they are based on regular expressions.