Adds support for GA4 properties and load `gtag.js` instead of `analytics.js`
See original GitHub issueI see that under the hood, @analytics/google-analytics loads analytics.js
. With Google now making the gtag.js
its official JavaScript tagging framework, any plan to update it with gtag
?
Happy to contribute.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Reactions:8
- Comments:19 (9 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
[UA→GA4] Tips for switching from analytics.js to gtag.js
To enable basic data collection for your Google Analytics 4 property, add the gtag. js snippet (the Google tag) to the <head> section...
Read more >Migrate from analytics.js to gtag.js (Universal Analytics)
This guide walks you through the process of migrating an existing analytics.js Universal Analytics implementation to use gtag.js .
Read more >new GTAG.js Analytics code (replaces Analytics.js code)
Additionally, Google has no upgrade path for analytics.js events to gtag.js events. So if you're a user who implemented events and didn't use...
Read more >gtag.js - Global Site Tag in Google Analytics - Tutorial
Unlike ga.js or analytics.js, it is not strictly a Google Analytics Library as it is supporting Google Adwords Conversion tracking and will ...
Read more >Get started with Google Analytics - Firebase
On this page; Before you begin; Add the Analytics SDK to your app. Use Firebase with existing gtag.js tagging. Start logging events; Next...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Just a headsup that I’m still working on this. Need some more time. But I’m on it~
Bumping the thread. Do we know how big a lift this will be?