Register JwtProof2020 or warn users not to use this library
See original GitHub issueRegister it here:
its 2021, where is the full IRI for JwtProof2020 ?
https://w3id.org/did/v1
does not define JwtProof2020
…
https://www.w3.org/ns/did/v1
does not define ANY proof formats (only verification methods)…
You should review https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/#dfn-context
and define a context which you control, where you can define all your terms for your users… see:
https://w3c.github.io/did-spec-registries/#schnorrsecp256k1verificationkey2019 https://w3c.github.io/did-spec-registries/#gpgverificationkey2020
Feel free to register your extensions in did spec registries as well.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:7 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
decentralized-identity/did-jwt-vc: Create and verify ... - GitHub
The JwtProof2020 is a synthetic proof type, usable for differentiating credentials by type. It is not a registered W3C VC Data Model algorithm...
Read more >Warning! This is not Identosphere Patron Only Content
The mission of the W3C Credentials Community Group is to explore the creation, storage, presentation, verification, and user control of ...
Read more >DIF Monthly #19 (June, 2021)
Jace from Bloom gave us a tour of the WACI spec. Q&A about the v0.1 and v1 scopes for the WACI-PEx work item/draft...
Read more >The did-jwt-vc from decentralized-identity - GithubHelp
Create a JWT by signing it with the previously configured issuer using the ... Register JwtProof2020 or warn users not to use this...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
awesome looks like #56 is headed in the correct direction.
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 1.1.0 🎉
The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀