Option to set "resourcetype" key
See original GitHub issueThis is an amazing package, thank you!
Would that be possible to provide an option to set resourcetype
using some user-defined name?
And also, to disable it completely as well (not adding it to the response)?
Cheers
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:8 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Selecting Which Resources AWS Config Records
Before you can specify resource types for the resourceTypes key, you must set the allSupported and includeGlobalResourceTypes options to false or omit them....
Read more >Azure resource providers and types
The resource type for a key vault is Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults. In this article, you learn how to: View all resource providers in Azure; Check ......
Read more >Resources - Configuration Language | Terraform
Resources correspond to infrastructure objects like virtual networks or compute instances. Learn about resource types, syntax, behavior, and arguments.
Read more >App resources overview
menu/, XML files that define app menus, such as an Options Menu, ... (the set of resources for a particular resource type that...
Read more >Configuring Oracle Field Service Cloud
Use the plus icon to add a new key-value pair. You can add a maximum of 20 key-value pairs, after which the icon...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
You can change the resource type field name like this:
Sorry, I haven’t included this in the documentation. When I have time I will do that.
About your second question. It’s not possible to remove the resourcetype field right now. May I ask, why do you need to remove it?
I keep this issue open until we add documentation for changing the resource type field name. Thanks for the question.