question-mark
Stuck on an issue?

Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.

And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.

Configuring browser extension feature request

See original GitHub issue

Summary

I’d love to be able to customize some of the options that axe-core exposes in the browser extensions.

Details

For the sites I work on, I know there are several warnings that either don’t apply to us or are things we can’t tackle right now so I’m only really interested in a subset of failures. Being able to limit the sometimes overwhelming output would be a big help in terms of focus but also not scaring away people new to testing.

axe-core exposes a lot of options and a lot might not be practical to expose in browser extension settings but an on/off toggle for each rule or group of rules would go a long way.

Future follow-up dream

Really, what I’d love is a way for sites to customize this for users. As an a11y champion at a large org, reminding/convincing people to run axe on all of their PRs is a constant for me. Being able to limit their initial shock could help ramp people up into it instead of throwing them in the deep end immediately.

I haven’t really seen something like this before, so just to explain a little more what I’m thinking:

  • www.example.com sets a config object on the window
  • the axe browser extension looks for that config, following it if available
  • axe browser extension adds a note in the UI that the config has been pre-set by the site, allowing the user to opt out of it

Issue Analytics

  • State:closed
  • Created 3 years ago
  • Comments:5 (4 by maintainers)

github_iconTop GitHub Comments

1reaction
erik-dequecommented, Apr 8, 2021

Wanted to follow up and say we’re actively working on something related to this.

1reaction
erik-dequecommented, Feb 1, 2021

Interesting suggestion. We already have plans to add ruleset customization in the extension, but have never thought about it being configured in such a way. We will think about this as we move towards implementing ruleset configuratgion.

Read more comments on GitHub >

github_iconTop Results From Across the Web

Extension workflows: Let users request extensions - Chrome ...
As an admin, you can use the Google Admin console to let users request the extensions that they need in the Chrome Web...
Read more >
Building a cross-browser extension - Mozilla - MDN Web Docs
A simple approach to addressing API differences is to limit the functions used in your extension to functions that offer the same functionality...
Read more >
chrome.webRequest - Chrome Developers
Each request is identified by a request ID. This ID is unique within a browser session and the context of an extension. It...
Read more >
A couple of feature requests. - Google Groups
If you need cross-origin requests, you can implement your app as a. Chrome extension. Extensions are higher privilege, and have more
Read more >
107006 - Feature request: ability to replay a previously made ...
Right now replaying POST requests require firefox+plugin and having this feature built in chrome would be awesome. Thanks you guys for the best...
Read more >

github_iconTop Related Medium Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related StackOverflow Question

No results found

github_iconTroubleshoot Live Code

Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free

github_iconTop Related Reddit Thread

No results found

github_iconTop Related Hackernoon Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related Tweet

No results found

github_iconTop Related Dev.to Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related Hashnode Post

No results found