extend link-name for better understandability
See original GitHub issueSo there already is the rule link-name
that checks if there is an accessible name for a link. This rule fails if the link contains an image with an empty / non existing alt attribute. The error message is always:
Links must have discernible text
My proposal is, that we extend this message in case of an empty / non existing alt attribute with something like:
The link contains an image with an empty alt attribute although it describes the link.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:13 (13 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
The E-utilities In-Depth: Parameters, Syntax and More - NCBI
Example values are 'relevance' and 'name' for Gene. Users should be aware that the default value of sort varies from one database to...
Read more >HAL Relation Type (rel) vs. Link name property - Stack Overflow
Last but not least, I'm wondering how either approach would impact the documentation of these links. Specifically, as "Extension Relation Types" ...
Read more >Information Scent: How Users Decide Where to Go Next
If the link name is too obscure and vague, people might miss a good ... and may not provide enough understandable cues for...
Read more >Links Remove Number Prefix - InDesign - Mars Premedia
This practice is an understandable means of organizing assets and certainly an aid to the designer when ... extension = String(String(link.name.match(/\.
Read more >Understandability: The Most Important Metric You're Not ...
Nowhere is this more apparent than in software engineering, where a developer's daily job is to modify, adapt, tweak, or even remake the...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Just a follow up. I’m working with @WilcoFiers to figure out the right approach here, but might be awhile.
Thanks for the bump. I’ll try to get you an answer soon. Haven’t been able to look at this much yet.