DynamoDBTemplate should accept IDynamoDBMapper instead of DynamoDBMapper
See original GitHub issueI’m creating an instance of DynamoDBTemplate
in some tests and just noticed that the constructor uses the DynamoDBMapper
class instead of an IDynamoDBMapper
interface. Not a huge deal as I can cast my IDynamoDBMapper
to DynamoDBMapper
but that really shouldn’t be necessary.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:5 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
IDynamoDBMapper (AWS SDK for Java - 1.12.362)
If DynamoDBMapperConfig.TableNameOverride is specified then, given table override will be used as table name for all input objects. See Also: DynamoDBMapper.
Read more >Error creating bean with name 'dynamoDB-DynamoDBMapper'
I have tried the following things: Adding a DynamoDBMapperFactory bean to my configuration class and making it primary; Different combinations ...
Read more >Class DynamoDBMapper - javadoc.io
In order to allow the mapper to correctly persist the data, each modeled property in the domain class should be accessible via getter...
Read more >Quick Guide to Integrate DynamoDB in Spring Boot - Baeldung
When accessing a local instance of DynamoDB these fields need to be ... DynamoDBMapper dynamoDBMapper; @Autowired private AmazonDynamoDB ...
Read more >DynamoDBMapper.scan - Java - Tabnine
DynamoDBTableMapper. · EnvironmentRepositoryDDB. · Pagination with DynamoDBMapper Java AWS SDK · DynamoDBTemplate. · Query from AWS DynamoDB for Android.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Opened an issue for that.
https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-java/issues/1802
Good catch (And totally agree) & Easy to fix. Thanks!