Ipv6 change request overrides ipv4 and vise versa
See original GitHub issueMy openwrt is configured to use desec as dyndns like this:
So there are two processes that update ipv4 and ipv6 separately making requests:
https://update.dedyn.io/?username=&password=&hostname=myhost&myipv4=127.0.0.1
https://update.dedyn.io/?username=&password=&hostname=myhost&myipv6=::1
And it seems like request to update ipv6 wipes ipv4 and request to update ipv4 wipes ipv6.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:5 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Chapter 4 Making the Transition From IPv4 to IPv6 (Reference)
The rationale for transition is either the lack of IPv4 address space or the required use of new features in IPv6, or both....
Read more >1. DNS and IPv6 - DNS and BIND on IPv6 [Book] - O'Reilly
As IPv6 becomes the predominant protocol on the Internet, the remaining pockets of IPv4 will need to accommodate IPv6, not vice versa. I...
Read more >Transition from IPv4 to IPv6 address - GeeksforGeeks
When we want to send a request from an IPv4 address to an IPv6 address, but it isn't possible because IPv4 and IPv6...
Read more >IPv6 Configuration Types | pfSense Documentation
The default IPv4 and IPv6 gateways work independently of one another. The two need not be on the same interface. Changing the default...
Read more >RFC 3484 Default Address Selection for IPv6 - IETF
For example, when DNS name resolution yields both IPv6 and IPv4 addresses ... be construed to override an application or upper-layer's explicit choice...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@peterthomassen , I would love to contribute, but given I have too many side-project at this time I’m afraid I won’t produce good enough code. I’ll try to find time later, though!
We only support this quirky interface because it so many routers support it out-of-the-box. In your case, you seem to have far-reaching control over which software your router is running. Why not use the REST API in this case? It has much better behavior and allows for fine-grained control over how you want to update the DNS information.
Anyways, I think the
ipv6=preserve
(andipv4=preserve
) option could be a valuable extension of the quirky update API that we are currently providing.